LDA21-0442 Garneau 82 Avenue Rezoning

Engagement has concluded

A colour rendering of a new building (11024 - 82 Avenue NW) outlined in blue from an aerial viewpoint.

Image: City Massing Model Rendering (subject to change)

***This engagement has concluded and a What We Heard Report is now available.***

Please review the information on this page, including the documents and important links sections on the right hand side. Tell us what you think and ask any questions below, before the end of the day on January 24, 2022.

APPLICATION DETAILS

The City has received an application (map) to rezone 11024 - 82 Avenue NW from the (US) Urban Services Zone to the (CB3) Commercial Mixed Business Zone with the Main Streets Overlay. The application has three components.

Proposed Rezoning

The proposed rezoning coupled with an associated amendment to the Main Streets Overlay (see below) would allow for the development of a high-rise, mixed-use tower with the following characteristics:

  • A maximum podium height of 13.0 metres (approximately 3 storeys) and an overall maximum building height of 75 metres (approximately 22 storeys).

  • Pedestrian-oriented commercial space at ground level facing 82 (Whyte) Avenue NW with a residential tower above. Commercial uses allowed could include, but are not not limited to, general retail stores, health services, personal service shops (eg hairdressers, etc) and specialty food services.

  • A maximum tower floor plate area of 850 square metres.

  • Requiring any vehicle parking provided to be accessed from the rear lane and any surface or above-ground parking to be screened from view.

Note: While not the applicant’s current intent, the proposed CB3 Zone would also allow for an entirely commercial building. Should the applicant pursue a commercial-only building, the maximum height allowed would be reduced to 36 metres (approximately 8-10 storeys). The images below show two potential building shapes for this option.

A colour rendering of a new building (11024 - 82 Avenue NW) outlined in blue from an aerial viewpoint.A colour rendering of a new building (11024 - 82 Avenue NW) outlined in blue from an aerial viewpoint.

Images: Potential Alternate City Massing Model Renderings (subject to change)

Main Streets Overlay Amendment

Along with this rezoning application, there is also a proposal to amend the Main Streets Overlay, mainly as it is applied to the CB3 Zone. For the CB3 Zone, key changes proposed include introducing a tower floor plate size restriction and allowing an increase to the maximum building height under certain contexts. For all commercial zones subject to the overlay, the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) exemption contained in the overlay would be expanded to all residential and residential-related uses (not just multi-unit housing).

Garneau Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP) Amendment

An accompanying application has been made to amend the Garneau ARP in the following ways to enable this rezoning:

  • Amending 4 maps to reflect the proposed rezoning, if approved

  • Amending Policies 1.5 and 1.8 to allow for an expansion of commercial uses in a high-rise form. Together, these policies currently prohibit rezonings for commercial development and limit height to 6 storeys; and

  • Adding the CB3 Zone to the list of land use districts in Section 5. This would be the first such use of the CB3 Zone in Garneau. The plan pre-dates the creation of this zone.

The City has not yet taken a position of support or non-support on this application. The City’s position will be determined by a thorough analysis of the proposal that includes technical considerations (e.g. traffic and drainage impacts) and alignment to applicable City land use-related plans and policies (eg. The City Plan).

For additional information about the application, please refer to the documents and links in the right hand sidebar.

APPLICATION BACKGROUND

The City held a formal Rezoning Pre-Application Meeting with the applicant on July 7, 2021 to discuss the potential zoning options for achieving their objectives for this redevelopment. The only other zoning option that had merit was to use a (DC2) Site Specific Development Control Provision. The Zoning Bylaw directs what situations are appropriate to use a DC2 Provision, which are:

  • the proposed development exceeds the development provisions of the closest equivalent conventional Zone;

  • the proposed development requires specific/comprehensive regulations to ensure land Use conflicts with neighbouring properties are minimized;

  • the Site for the proposed development has unique characteristics that require specific regulations; or

  • the ongoing operation of the proposed development requires specific regulations.

The City concluded that this application did not trigger these criteria. As a result, it was agreed between the City and the applicant that the best course of action was to pursue a rezoning of the site to the (CB3) Commercial Mixed Business Zone while also proposing some modifications to the Main Streets Overlay.

Engagement

The City will use any feedback that you share to make sure the review of the application is as complete as possible, and will also summarize it for City Council so that they know your perspective prior to making a decision.

Because the rezoning is to a standard zone (CB3), the scope of public input is limited as the City cannot adjust or customize standard zone regulations based on public feedback. However, there is some opportunity for public input to help fine tune the proposed changes to the Main Streets Overlay regulations.


For additional information about this application, please refer to the documents and important links sections on the right hand side of this page.

Image: City Massing Model Rendering (subject to change)

***This engagement has concluded and a What We Heard Report is now available.***

Please review the information on this page, including the documents and important links sections on the right hand side. Tell us what you think and ask any questions below, before the end of the day on January 24, 2022.

APPLICATION DETAILS

The City has received an application (map) to rezone 11024 - 82 Avenue NW from the (US) Urban Services Zone to the (CB3) Commercial Mixed Business Zone with the Main Streets Overlay. The application has three components.

Proposed Rezoning

The proposed rezoning coupled with an associated amendment to the Main Streets Overlay (see below) would allow for the development of a high-rise, mixed-use tower with the following characteristics:

  • A maximum podium height of 13.0 metres (approximately 3 storeys) and an overall maximum building height of 75 metres (approximately 22 storeys).

  • Pedestrian-oriented commercial space at ground level facing 82 (Whyte) Avenue NW with a residential tower above. Commercial uses allowed could include, but are not not limited to, general retail stores, health services, personal service shops (eg hairdressers, etc) and specialty food services.

  • A maximum tower floor plate area of 850 square metres.

  • Requiring any vehicle parking provided to be accessed from the rear lane and any surface or above-ground parking to be screened from view.

Note: While not the applicant’s current intent, the proposed CB3 Zone would also allow for an entirely commercial building. Should the applicant pursue a commercial-only building, the maximum height allowed would be reduced to 36 metres (approximately 8-10 storeys). The images below show two potential building shapes for this option.

A colour rendering of a new building (11024 - 82 Avenue NW) outlined in blue from an aerial viewpoint.A colour rendering of a new building (11024 - 82 Avenue NW) outlined in blue from an aerial viewpoint.

Images: Potential Alternate City Massing Model Renderings (subject to change)

Main Streets Overlay Amendment

Along with this rezoning application, there is also a proposal to amend the Main Streets Overlay, mainly as it is applied to the CB3 Zone. For the CB3 Zone, key changes proposed include introducing a tower floor plate size restriction and allowing an increase to the maximum building height under certain contexts. For all commercial zones subject to the overlay, the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) exemption contained in the overlay would be expanded to all residential and residential-related uses (not just multi-unit housing).

Garneau Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP) Amendment

An accompanying application has been made to amend the Garneau ARP in the following ways to enable this rezoning:

  • Amending 4 maps to reflect the proposed rezoning, if approved

  • Amending Policies 1.5 and 1.8 to allow for an expansion of commercial uses in a high-rise form. Together, these policies currently prohibit rezonings for commercial development and limit height to 6 storeys; and

  • Adding the CB3 Zone to the list of land use districts in Section 5. This would be the first such use of the CB3 Zone in Garneau. The plan pre-dates the creation of this zone.

The City has not yet taken a position of support or non-support on this application. The City’s position will be determined by a thorough analysis of the proposal that includes technical considerations (e.g. traffic and drainage impacts) and alignment to applicable City land use-related plans and policies (eg. The City Plan).

For additional information about the application, please refer to the documents and links in the right hand sidebar.

APPLICATION BACKGROUND

The City held a formal Rezoning Pre-Application Meeting with the applicant on July 7, 2021 to discuss the potential zoning options for achieving their objectives for this redevelopment. The only other zoning option that had merit was to use a (DC2) Site Specific Development Control Provision. The Zoning Bylaw directs what situations are appropriate to use a DC2 Provision, which are:

  • the proposed development exceeds the development provisions of the closest equivalent conventional Zone;

  • the proposed development requires specific/comprehensive regulations to ensure land Use conflicts with neighbouring properties are minimized;

  • the Site for the proposed development has unique characteristics that require specific regulations; or

  • the ongoing operation of the proposed development requires specific regulations.

The City concluded that this application did not trigger these criteria. As a result, it was agreed between the City and the applicant that the best course of action was to pursue a rezoning of the site to the (CB3) Commercial Mixed Business Zone while also proposing some modifications to the Main Streets Overlay.

Engagement

The City will use any feedback that you share to make sure the review of the application is as complete as possible, and will also summarize it for City Council so that they know your perspective prior to making a decision.

Because the rezoning is to a standard zone (CB3), the scope of public input is limited as the City cannot adjust or customize standard zone regulations based on public feedback. However, there is some opportunity for public input to help fine tune the proposed changes to the Main Streets Overlay regulations.


For additional information about this application, please refer to the documents and important links sections on the right hand side of this page.

Engagement has concluded

You can:

  • Ask a question directly to the file planner that is processing the application. When necessary, we will work with the application to provide an answer.

  • Search and view community-submitted questions and official responses.

  • Type your question in the box below and click "Submit". Answers are typically provided within 5 business days.

Please note you must be registered on Engaged Edmonton in order to provide feedback.  However, only your username will be displayed publicly, all other information is kept confidential.  We use this information to distinguish between feedback received from neighbouring/local area residents and other interested stakeholders.  

You may also provide feedback to the Project Planner directly via the contact information under the "who's listening" section of the page.  Please refrain from submitting a question on the site, and providing a duplicate question to the planner.  It is not necessary to do both in order for the question to be received.

  • I'm a Garneau Gates resident (the building directly across the back alley from the proposed development).  I'm wondering, what criteria does the City use in a case like this, to determine if it's appropriate to allow a 22-storey building to be built directly behind a 5-storey residential building like ours?  If this were to go ahead, the units on the back of our building will basically have their ability to see the sky and sunlight from their balcony virtually obliterated by this, as well as be subjected to increased traffic in the lane, and no doubt substantially reduced property values.  So, this would be immensely problematic for a huge number of our owners and residents here if this were to go ahead, and I'm curious why the City is even entertaining such a proposal when it is so obvious the negative impact this would have on us, the building's closest neighbour.   Should the value of our residents' existing homes not take priority over the interests of a company wanting to come in after the fact, have the location rezoned, and land a massive building behind us?  If not, why not?  

    EdmonTalk asked over 2 years ago

    Under the Municipal Government Act and the City’s Zoning Bylaw, developers have the right to make rezoning applications and the City is obligated to process such applications and advance them to City Council for consideration.

    City Council considers City Administration’s review and recommendation when making decisions on proposed rezonings.  City Administration has not yet taken a position of support or non-support on this proposed rezoning. 

    Administration’s position will be determined by a thorough review of the proposal which involves a number of criteria, including:

    1. Relationship to and compliance with approved Statutory Plans and City Council policy.  In this case, mainly the Garneau Area Redevelopment Plan and The City Plan.

    2. Compatibility with surrounding development in terms of use, function and scale of development. This is where shadow impacts would be factored in.

    3. Technical considerations, such as traffic impacts and relationship to, or impacts on, services such as water and sewage systems, public transit and other utilities and public facilities such as recreational facilities and schools;

    4. Effect on stability, retention and rehabilitation of desirable existing Uses, buildings, or both in the area;

    5. Necessity and appropriateness of the proposed Zone in view of the stated intentions of the applicant; and

    6. Relationship to the documented concerns and opinions of area residents regarding the application. 

    Zoning regulates how we use land and helps ensure what is built is compatible with the surrounding area. This includes what types of buildings are allowed on a site (eg. residential or commercial) and the basic size and shape of those buildings. 

    Zoning does not regulate who can live or work in the buildings, how the buildings are operated once constructed, whether the property is rented or owned or the potential impact, positive or negative, on surrounding property values.  As a result, these factors cannot be taken into consideration as part of the rezoning application review. 

  • Question from a Garneau Gates resident (the building directly across the back alley from the proposed development). Can you confirm that, if this project were to go ahead, all underground parkade exhaust vents for the new building AND all building/furnace exhaust vents would NOT vent into the back alley where our units that have balconies in back of our building are located? Can you confirm that all venting and exhaust would instead be located on top of and/or in the front of the new building, and would vent out towards the road (Whyte Ave)?

    EdmonTalk asked over 2 years ago

    The exact location of parkade exhaust vents is something that will be determined at the Development Permit stage, should the rezoning be approved by Council.  It’s also important to note that under the Open Option Parking rules adopted by Council in 2020, developers can now choose how much on-site parking they provide with new developments. If the developer chooses to provide on-site parking, they can choose whether to provide it underground, at ground level or in an above ground parking structure.  

    The Zoning Bylaw does not include specific regulations for the location or orientation of these vents, but the City makes every effort to ensure they are located as sensitively as possible when reviewing application drawings.  That said, it is common for the location with the least undesirable impacts to be the lane.  It is unlikely that the City will accept vents oriented towards the public sidewalk along Whyte Avenue. 

    From a Building Code (and associated trade discipline) perspective, there are minimum clearance requirements from adjacent properties, building openings etc. for intake/exhaust air and appliance vent terminations. These will be reviewed through the permit application and construction stages should the rezoning be approved by Council.


  • I'm writing from Garneau Gates, the building across the back alley from the proposed development.  A major issue for construction of new buildings (and destruction of existing ones) within established neighbourhoods like this is the impact of construction vibrations on adjacent buildings, and the possible damage this can cause.  Given how close our building is to the one being proposed (which would also involve demolition of the current one), I'm wondering, specifically what safeguards are in place to ensure that vibrations stay within a safe range that cannot possibly cause any damage to our building in any way, shape, or form?  More specifically, what requirements do the construction of the new building (and destruction of the existing building) have to adhere to as far as vibration levels (i.e. what is the specific value of the safe level that is permitted on these projects)?  My understanding is that a maximum of 0.5 in/s is considered the only safe level, so can you provide assurance that they will not exceed that? Also, who from the city will be monitoring that and how will they do so, to ensure that vibration stays within that safe range?  (Of course if any damage to our building does occur, the builder/developer would be required to compensate fully for this, but I'm interested in ensuring there's no damage in the first place, hence these questions.).

    EdmonTalk asked over 2 years ago

    The City reviews Building or Demolition Permit applications which may include details about the construction or demolition plans and methods. For the application to be processed, it must align with the National Building Code-Alberta Edition (the Building Code).

    The Building Code doesn’t provide any details specific to vibration levels, but does require the owner of a construction or demolition site to ensure that work undertaken does not damage or create a hazard to adjacent properties. The City’s Community Standards Bylaw also contains a section about noise control related to construction activity, though it does not specifically mention vibrations.

    The City does not provide ongoing proactive monitoring of construction or demolition sites, as it is the responsibility of the owner, professionals and builders to ensure the Building Code and related bylaws are observed. However, the City will investigate complaints related to construction activities, whether that be a potential violation of the Community Standards Bylaw, the Building Permit or Building Code.  If there is a violation, the City has the ability to issue a Stop Work Order and engage the site owner in addressing the issue(s).  

    While the City does its best to try to reduce the risk of potential impacts to adjacent properties and ensure builders are following good construction practices through the above outlined permitting and enforcement practices, there are no assurances.  Prior to the start of neighbouring construction, homeowners are encouraged to consider:

    • contacting their property insurer for advice

    • documenting the current state of their property (e.g. photos of the yard, house exterior and fence) and

    • Looking into options to assess their foundation and to document its current condition, if they have concerns about the potential effects of excavation or vibration.

    The City’s residential infill webpage also has additional resources and information available for neighbours of infill. 

  • What does the city plan to do to maintain safety and noise control issues, problems that already exist, when the number of vehicles and after hours people will rise exponentially?. We live near Whyte Ave and the university, so it's relatively safe to assume that many occupants of this building will be university students who party regularly. Will the city plan to make this a regular beat for local police presence?

    over 2 years ago

    Zoning regulates how we use land and helps ensure what is built is compatible with the surrounding area. This includes what types of buildings are allowed on a site (eg. residential or commercial) and the basic size and shape of those buildings. Zoning does not regulate who can live or work in the buildings, how the buildings are operated once constructed, or whether the property is rented or owned.  As a result, these factors cannot be taken into consideration as part of the rezoning application review.

    There are a variety of bylaws and legislative tools outside the Zoning Bylaw to ensure developments are well operated if they are approved. Issues related to noise from people or vehicles are regulated by the Community Standards Bylaw and the City will investigate complaints received about this bylaw being infringed.

    At the Development Permit stage, when detailed site and building drawings are being reviewed, the City has the authority to require the applicant to provide a Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Assessment to ensure common and public areas are designed in a way to minimize opportunities for crime.  The Edmonton Police Service has reviewed this proposed rezoning and did not express any concerns. 

  • How does the city plan to adapt the alley for the natural light which will be lost with such a massive building behind us?

    over 2 years ago

    The shadow impacts are something the City is reviewing and considering as part of it’s planning analysis of the proposed rezoning and will factor into the City’s overall recommendation to City Council.  However, if Council approves the zone, knowing what the shadow impacts are, there would not be any adaptation of the alley to address any loss of natural light.

  • Are there going to be mandates for the building about garbage maintenance? Obviously they will require more garbage bins for the increased number of occupants; where does the city plan to mandate they be placed? The alley is narrow at the best of times and the ability to accommodate more garbage bins will be a challenge.

    over 2 years ago

    The Zoning Bylaw requires waste collection areas for new developments to be entirely on site and screened from view from any adjacent sites. The applicant will be required to use space on their site to ensure the bins do not obstruct or sit in the lane. At the Development Permit stage, detailed site and building drawings will be reviewed by Waste Management Services to ensure the screening requirements are met, that the waste collection area is large enough to accommodate the required number of bins on site, and that the City’s collection vehicles will be able to access them.  If the building is constructed and the planned location and operations for waste collection are not being followed, concerns can be raised to the City by contacting 311.

  • How does the city plan to maintain the alley, which is already crumbling, when traffic quadruples or more?

    over 2 years ago

    If the rezoning is approved, improvements to the lane will be required at the developer’s expense upon the site’s redevelopment. This includes repaving the lane and potentially having the site provide a half-metre, hard-surfaced setback free of obstructions (to effectively expand the lane) depending on the anticipated vehicular activity. Site access and lane upgrade requirements will be further reviewed at the development permit stage.

  • Does the city offer some kind of compensation if I lose property value because of this addition?

    over 2 years ago

    The City does not provide compensation for lost property value due to a rezoning or redevelopment. Under the Municipal Government Act and the Zoning Bylaw, property owners and developers have the right to submit rezoning applications and the City is obligated to process such applications and advance them to City Council for consideration. With that said, we understand that these kinds of changes to zoning can have impacts on surrounding properties, which is why the rezoning process is public, transparent, and ultimately decided by elected representatives on City Council.