LDA23-0363 Mill Woods Town Centre Phase 1

We need citywide bold vision when approving projects. This shopping plaza is an eyesore and thus I believe a new development is long overdue.

No matter what type of building is placed in and around the Millwoods town center area, needs to reflect and respect the community it dwells within. The Mall is a community hub as well as the library. This building should reflect that. Renovations to the whole area in and around the mall will help to revitalize the community and make a wiser use of space. I agree that the towers should match the height of existing buildings, not just for aesthetics but for architectural purposes as well.
I cannot stress enough that no matter what is put on the ground in Millwoods MUST respect the community it's in.

Adding high density housing close to LRT stations is exactly what the city should be doing. Approving this is a no-brainer.

With the new LRT up and running and the City plan encouraging density in proximity to transit, accepting these changes seems fine to me.



Many commercial spaces around the city are having a hard time finding tenants so forcing the developer to provide spaces that likely won't get filled will not benefit anyone. A few extra ground level, street oriented units will add a few extra residential units to the market which are much more needed than commercial right now.



A little extra height off the get go might be weird but it will set the precedent for the node and will allow for a little more density in the area which I believe is a good thing. If the developer wants to add extra residential units to the market why stop them? It adds supply which will only help keep housing in Edmonton more affordable than the other major cities in the country.



Setbacks are ok as long as they're not for parking. The space between the transit center/LRT station and the development should all be pedestrianized so if there's a little extra room for a plaza and trees that's fine. A larger setback could allow a restaurant or cafe to setup a patio which could greatly add to the vibrancy of the new Mill Woods node. A daycare could also create a little fenced off area as an outdoor play space.

Growth is good
Housing is good
What’s the problem
There is enough land there to build 4 22 story towers
Get er done!

With the new LRT up and running and the City plan encouraging density in proximity to transit, accepting these changes seems fine to me.

Many commercial spaces around the city are having a hard time finding tenants so forcing the developer to provide spaces that likely won't get filled will not benefit anyone. A few extra ground level, street oriented units will add a few extra residential units to the market which are much more needed than commercial right now.

A little extra height off the get go might be weird but it will set the precedent for the node and will allow for a little more density in the area which I believe is a good thing. If the developer wants to add extra residential units to the market why stop them? It adds supply which will only help keep housing in Edmonton more affordable than the other major cities in the country.

Setbacks are ok as long as they're not for parking. The space between the transit center/LRT station and the development should all be pedestrianized so if there's a little extra room for a plaza and trees that's fine. A larger setback could allow a restaurant or cafe to setup a patio which could greatly add to the vibrancy of the new Mill Woods node. A daycare could also create a little fenced off area as an outdoor play space.

With the new LRT up and running and the City plan encouraging density in proximity to transit, accepting these changes seems fine to me.

Many commercial spaces around the city are having a hard time finding tenants so forcing the developer to provide spaces that likely won't get filled will not benefit anyone. A few extra ground level, street oriented units will add a few extra residential units to the market which are much more needed than commercial right now.

A little extra height off the get go might be weird but it will set the precedent for the node and will allow for a little more density in the area which I believe is a good thing. If the developer wants to add extra residential units to the market why stop them? It adds supply which will only help keep housing in Edmonton more affordable than the other major cities in the country.

Setbacks are ok as long as they're not for parking. The space between the transit center/LRT station and the development should all be pedestrianized so if there's a little extra room for a plaza and trees that's fine. A larger setback could allow a restaurant or cafe to setup a patio which could greatly add to the vibrancy of the new Mill Woods node. A daycare could also create a little fenced off area as an outdoor play space.

With the new LRT up and running and the City plan encouraging density in proximity to transit, accepting these changes seems fine to me.

Many commercial spaces around the city are having a hard time finding tenants so forcing the developer to provide spaces that likely won't get filled will not benefit anyone. A few extra ground level, street oriented units will add a few extra residential units to the market which are much more needed than commercial right now.

A little extra height off the get go might be weird but it will set the precedent for the node and will allow for a little more density in the area which I believe is a good thing. If the developer wants to add extra residential units to the market why stop them? It adds supply which will only help keep housing in Edmonton more affordable than the other major cities in the country.

Setbacks are ok as long as they're not for parking. The space between the transit center/LRT station and the development should all be pedestrianized so if there's a little extra room for a plaza and trees that's fine. A larger setback could allow a restaurant or cafe to setup a patio which could greatly add to the vibrancy of the new Mill Woods node. A daycare could also create a little fenced off area as an outdoor play space.

With the new LRT up and running and the City plan encouraging density in proximity to transit, accepting these changes seems fine to me.

Many commercial spaces around the city are having a hard time finding tenants so forcing the developer to provide spaces that likely won't get filled will not benefit anyone. A few extra ground level, street oriented units will add a few extra residential units to the market which are much more needed than commercial right now.

A little extra height off the get go might be weird but it will set the precedent for the node and will allow for a little more density in the area which I believe is a good thing. If the developer wants to add extra residential units to the market why stop them? It adds supply which will only help keep housing in Edmonton more affordable than the other major cities in the country.

Setbacks are ok as long as they're not for parking. The space between the transit center/LRT station and the development should all be pedestrianized so if there's a little extra room for a plaza and trees that's fine. A larger setback could allow a restaurant or cafe to setup a patio which could greatly add to the vibrancy of the new Mill Woods node. A daycare could also create a little fenced off area as an outdoor play space.

I do not think that the traffic in this area can handle this. I live less than a kilometer away and everyone near here avoids 28 Ave as hard as we can as is. 550 units worth of cars would make going to any of those retail areas an absolute no go. I would prefer to drive further but be in motion vs be inching through that awful 4 way intersection between burger king and Tim Hortons.
I think this would be better suited near a more major intersection.

Yes please. This should have been built 10 years ago. We are in a housing crisis. Build it or you'll be voted out next election.

Yes please. This should have been built 10 years ago. We are in a housing crisis. Build it or you'll be voted out next election.

Yes please. This should have been built 10 years ago. We are in a housing crisis. Build it or you'll be voted out next election.

think it would be better to keep the lower levels as commercial and preserve the vibes of the area, as well as promote business growth. Adjusting the setback is justified, but other than that, I see no real need to modify the zoning.

Absolutely not we have a city needs roads fixed u have lived here all my life I am very upset where our tax payer money goes enough of this

I think redevelopment of this site is needed - it no longer functions as a viable mall environment

Thank you for allowing my feedback with the future development of Millwoods Town Centre.
1. I love the idea of increasing shopping in a mall set up. More stores , restaurants, greater variety of stores, even outlet type stores like South Edmonton Common and current shopping stores in newer areas.
2. I think a parkade should be considered on the premises to help with the demand for parking currently effecting my shopping experiences and the LRT parking situation.
3. Lower the height if the towers and the number of residential units in the towers planned.
Millwoods has a very high density problem and it is getting continually worse every day. Traffic on 50th street deals with vehicles from all areas including Beaumont. Increasing the density will not only increase vehicle traffic but also the foot traffic around the mall. Currently the increase the crime and vandalism in my area should also be considered. Our homeless population has skyrocketed since the Valley Line began operating. All these negative issue’s will surely increase with increased density especially if it includes low cost housing.
In my opinion the major issue of the plan is to cut the residential suites in half at least.

Revitalization of the retail space plus the addition of housing units would be welcomed - why not incorporate a NYC style of living above retail? This would also contribute to a 20 minute city. 22 storeys seems too high for the area, however.

The more residents in this area the better. People here will feed transit, local retail, and foster a sense of community. If the developer thinks setting the building back further in exchange for more height will help them accomplish their vision, then i support it. My only hope is that this building integrates itself well with local transit and pedestrian facilities; such as accessible and convenient commercial units.

Transit-oriented development is the best.