142 Street Pedestrian/Cyclist Bridge - Draft Concept(s)


Thank you for participating in the online engagement for the 142 Street Pedestrian/Cyclist Bridge. The tools are now closed.


The feedback from the online engagement, including emails and phone calls from community members received by the Project Manager, will be considered alongside technical requirements, funding availability and City plans and policies to decide on a preferred bridge concept, open space enhancements and active transportation concept.


If you have any questions, please email: 142StreetBridge@edmonton.ca


Thank you for participating in the online engagement for the 142 Street Pedestrian/Cyclist Bridge. The tools are now closed.


The feedback from the online engagement, including emails and phone calls from community members received by the Project Manager, will be considered alongside technical requirements, funding availability and City plans and policies to decide on a preferred bridge concept, open space enhancements and active transportation concept.


If you have any questions, please email: 142StreetBridge@edmonton.ca

Discussions: All (3) Open (0)

  • Shared-Use Path Concept Option 1: High on Berm

    by Tim D, about 3 years ago
    63 Responses
    CLOSED: This discussion has concluded.

    You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    We would like to hear from you about the options for the active transportation concepts.

    How to participate: Review the image below then share your feedback. You can also read and comment on what others have written, and agree or disagree. Please remember to be respectful.

    Image showing shared-use path option 1 high on berm

    Questions: 

    • What do you like about the Shared-Use Path Option 1?
    • What could be improved about the Shared-Use Path Option 1?


    Option 1 considerations:

    • Located high on berm along existing informal footpath
    • Access to neighbourhood to 50 Avenue, and alleys connecting to 144 Street and 47 Avenue 
    • Buffered from the neighbourhood by trees, alleyway, and residential fence line
    • May be visible from some properties



  • Shared-Use Path Concept Option 2: Low on Berm

    by Tim D, about 3 years ago
    44 Responses
    CLOSED: This discussion has concluded.

    You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    We would like to hear from you about the options for the active transportation concepts.

    How to participate: Review the image below then share your feedback. You can also read and comment on what others have written, and agree or disagree. Please remember to be respectful.

    image showing shared-use path option 2 low on berm

    Questions: 

    • What do you like about the Shared-Use Path Option 2?
    • What could be improved about the Shared-Use Path Option 2?


    Option 2 considerations:

    • Located low on berm along existing informal footpath
    • Access to neighbourhood at 50 Avenue, and alley south of 144 Street and 47 Avenue.
    • Buffered from the neighbourhood by trees, alleyway, and residential fence
    • Less visible from properties



  • 142 Street Experiences

    by Tim D, about 3 years ago
    53 Responses
    CLOSED: This discussion has concluded.

    You need to be signed in to add your comment.

    Currently, 142 Street north of the Whitemud is designated as a shared roadway.

    We would like to hear from you about your experiences of 142 Street.

    How to participate: Review the image below then share your feedback. You can also read and comment on what others have written, and agree or disagree. Please remember to be respectful.

    image showing 142 Street currently and with sharrow and cycling symbols

    Question: 

    •  Considering elements such as safety and user-comfort, what could improve your experience as a pedestrian or cyclist on 142 Street?