LDA20-0314 T5M Connect DC2- North Glenora
Consultation has concluded
***The discussion has concluded and a What We Heard Report will be posted here when available.***
Thank you for participating in engagement activities for this rezoning application.
The application is expected to go to City Council Public Hearing for a decision, with the exact date still to be determined. For more information, please visit these FAQs (External link) for Council meetings.
***The discussion has concluded and a What We Heard Report will be posted here when available.***
Thank you for participating in engagement activities for this rezoning application.
The application is expected to go to City Council Public Hearing for a decision, with the exact date still to be determined. For more information, please visit these FAQs (External link) for Council meetings.
Tell us what you think of the Application
Please let us know what you like and what could be better about this application. What should Council know as they decide whether or not to approve the rezoning? Other people that visit this part of the site will be able to see your comments.
CLOSED: This discussion has concluded.
Tell us how we did!
Provide your feedback on digital public engagement activities.
Stay Informed
Click here to share your email address to stay up to date on this application! Your email will be used to inform you about this zoning application in the future.
For more information about registering to stay engaged with other City projects and initiatives, visit the Engaged Edmonton FAQ page.
Who's Listening
-
Planner II
ASPhone 780-442-0699 Email andrew.sherstone@edmonton.ca
ADVISE
ADVISE
This means the City asks the public to share feedback and perspectives that are considered for policies, programs, projects, or services.
ROLE OF THE PUBLIC
Timelines
-
October 13, 2020
LDA20-0314 T5M Connect DC2- North Glenora has finished this stageApplication accepted for processing.
-
October 15, 2020
LDA20-0314 T5M Connect DC2- North Glenora has finished this stageNotification postcard mailed out to property owners within 60 metres of the site and the Community League providing information about the application and inviting feedback.
-
February 22, 2021
LDA20-0314 T5M Connect DC2- North Glenora is currently at this stageLaunch of Engaged Edmonton webpage. Feedback accepted until March 8, 2021.
-
Q2, 2021
this is an upcoming stage for LDA20-0314 T5M Connect DC2- North GlenoraAnticipated date for City Council public hearing and decision by City Council.
How Your Feedback Will Be Used
We appreciate your feedback and will use it to:
- inform the City’s planning analysis and ensure all factors are taken into consideration;
- help inform conversations with the applicant about making revisions to address concerns; and
- summarize feedback for City Council so that they know your perspective prior to making a decision.
A summary of what we hear from this engagement will be posted on this webpage and provided to City Council when the application advances to Public Hearing for a decision. When the applicant is ready to take the application to Council, notices of the Public Hearing date will be sent to surrounding property owners. You can register to speak at the City Council Public Hearing or listen online. Click here for more information about how to speak to Council. You can also submit written comments to City Council through the Office of the City Clerk (city.clerk@edmonton.ca).
Information about Rezoning
Zoning regulates what types of buildings are allowed on a site (eg. residential or commercial) and the basic size and shape of those buildings. It does not control who can live or work in the buildings or whether the property is rented or owned.
The City's Development Services Branch reviews the rezoning application based on:
- Approved policies, plans and guidelines;
- Planning analysis (how the proposed zone fits into the neighbourhood);
- Technical information (traffic impacts, water and sewer capacity, etc.); and
- Public input (feedback from the public will be summarized in the final report to Council).
I think it's a great idea to have a development like this in North Glenora. It has a nice look to it, a definite improvement to what is currently there. I think it will be a boon to the school, and add a good mix of people to the neighbourhood. It would be a good place for my kids to start our owning their first place and start raising a family.
I too am concerned about the parking requirements, especially when on-street parking is expected to be used. When there are snow-clearing days I wonder where the residents will park. But in my opinion that is not enough of a drawback for me to be against the project. I encourage Council to approve the rezoning.
I have concerns around the added density to an already busy corner of the neighbourhood and the impact to the surrounding residents. The proposed design does not match the current block face with access from both the ave and the street. I also have concerns with only providing 8 parking stalls for a facility that has 16 units. This is going to set a precedence in the neighbourhood and open the flood gates of over development.
We are residents of North Glenora and we also support this redevelopment proposal. It would be a shame if the city council decline the rezoning application and potentially kill this project. This new development could mean more affordable housing options for young families/professionals in this good but could be better neighbourhood!
We are residents of North Glenora and are so happy to see this corner develop. We love the contemporary design of the apartments and feel it will be a great addition to the neighbourhood. The scale of the apartment facade fits nicely within the neighbourhood fabric! We can't wait to see this project enter construction.
I'm a resident of North Glenora. I am supportive of this development. Our neighbourhood lacks options for dining and entertainment that don't require driving or walking across a major traffic artery. Moreover, the current building on that site is in a real state of disrepair and would best be replaced. This development has the potential to improve neighbourhood aesthetics and services.
I have concerns about the precedent this would set in regards to the set backs for other properties in the area. As there appears to be multiple properties currently exploring redevelopment, I don't think that an exception to the existing set back requirements should be granted.
We are opposed to multi-family development. Prefer to maintain the single family residences at this location.